insivo hears the other 52 — every one of them, confidentially, in about 15 minutes each. Not a sample. Not a survey. The whole organization, in a week.
Built for organizations between roughly 30 and 150 people.
Large organizations lose the signal in layers of reporting. At your size there are no layers — but there is also no mechanism. Nobody has time to sit down with sixty people, and the ones who speak up in meetings are not a representative sample of what is actually happening.
At this size insivo does not sample — it talks to the whole organization. What you get is not “most respondents felt”, it is what your company actually thinks.
You do not need a transformation office, a steering committee or a change workstream to run this. One person sets it up, everyone else gets a link.
Conversation window over a few days, analysis and findings in three to five. Short enough that the answer is still current when you act on it.
Business Central, Odoo, Weclapp, a new CRM. The rollout is technically done — but half the team still keeps its own spreadsheet, and nobody tells you which half.
The licences are bought and the kickoff happened. Who is genuinely faster now, who quietly stopped after two weeks, and what would actually help the second group.
You went from 30 to 90. Responsibilities blur, work gets done twice, and critical knowledge sits with three people who are always busy.
A handover, a new managing director, a restructured team. Everyone says the right things in the town hall. insivo tells you what they say when it is not a town hall.
If a report says “the finance team is frustrated” and finance is four people, nobody is anonymous — no matter what the privacy policy says. We treat that as a design constraint, not a footnote.
Participants join through a token rather than an account. Personal details are stripped automatically before anything is analysed.
Below a minimum group size, findings are reported for the organization as a whole rather than split by team. You lose a slice of granularity and keep the honesty that makes the answers worth having.
EU processing and EU hosting, a data processing agreement, defined deletion periods. Company size changes none of it. If a works council exists, the documentation for it ships as standard.
The last step is the one most companies skip — and the only one that tells you whether the effort was worth it.
No — that is the size this is built for. What changes is the shape of the result: you get a clear picture of the organization as a whole and of the larger functions, rather than a matrix broken down by every small team. Below roughly 30 people a structured conversation round usually tells you more than a system does.
Two things. You will not get sixty honest hours — and people answer their managing director differently than they answer a confidential conversation. The second difference is that insivo compares all sixty answers against each other and finds the pattern, which is the part that is genuinely hard to do in your head.
No. Connecting systems sharpens the picture, but the conversations stand on their own. At your size the useful connections are usually the ones you already run — your project tool, your ERP, and the documents that describe how things are supposed to work.
One call to frame the questions, then about 15 minutes per participant, taken whenever it suits them. Nobody has to block a workshop day, and you do not need to free up an internal project manager.
Participation is itself a finding. If a whole function stays silent, that is worth knowing — and it is usually the same function the rest of the answers are pointing at.
Thirty minutes on your situation — and an honest answer on whether your size is a fit.
30 minutes · no preparation needed · GDPR compliant · EU hosted