The system goes live, the plan is worked through, the licences are running — and the organization still does not follow. insivo shows where readiness, adoption and embodiment actually stand, weeks before the milestone turns red.
SAP ECC mainstream maintenance for EHP 6–8 ends 31 December 2027.
The system is live and the licences are running — but many users carry on exactly as before. Every percentage point of missing adoption is burnt migration budget.
After cutover, four or five key users carry the load for hundreds. They drop out or resign — and the process knowledge leaves with them.
Wherever the new system creates friction, workarounds appear: shadow spreadsheets, parallel processes, manual handovers. The rollout is formally complete — reality runs alongside it.
The data transfer works technically — but without disciplined upkeep, master data degrades within weeks: wrong material masters, duplicates, empty fields.
Confidential conversations with every key user surface overload and attrition risk before a key person drops out.
Front-line conversations reveal workarounds, shadow systems and what usage actually looks like.
Per-site and per-department readings show which unit carries the rollout and which has long fallen behind.
Where cycle times break down and teams get stuck in workarounds — made visible while it is still fixable.
Where knowledge transfer fails and dependency on external partners quietly builds.
The official status reconciled against what the teams actually experience.
German works councils are an approval step, not a risk — if you involve them early with the right documentation.
Co-determination under §87 (1) and §94 documented, including the anonymisation record.
UUID tokens instead of real names, SHA256 hashing, k-anonymity ≥ 5. No conclusions about individuals — including for you.
Transparency, documentation and human oversight designed in, not bolted on.
A survey measures the what on a scale. insivo delivers the why: adaptive conversations with follow-up questions, turned into a root-cause analysis with prioritised actions and named owners. You do not get a satisfaction score, you get a diagnosis you can work on.
Usually yes. §87 (1) no. 6 BetrVG makes applications subject to co-determination if they can record behaviour or performance; §94 covers questionnaires. insivo ships the required documentation — anonymisation concept, minimum group size, purpose limitation — as standard, so approval takes days rather than weeks.
About a week from setup to report: a conversation window over a few days, then analysis and report in 3 to 5 days. After that, remeasurement runs on a schedule rather than as a new project.
At any stage — from pre-kick-off through delivery to 3 to 6 months before go-live and beyond. It has the most impact before go-live, while readiness gaps can still be closed.
Processing happens exclusively in the EU. Raw data is deleted 90 days after the campaign ends, the token-to-email mapping within 24 hours. After the contract ends, all data is deleted or returned within 30 days. Only anonymised, aggregated results remain.
Bring your go-live date and your open risks. We will show you what insivo would surface in the first wave.
30 minutes · no preparation needed · GDPR compliant · EU hosted