Everything you need to know before you start.
Classic consulting delivers recommendations from 20 to 30 interviews, PowerPoint after 6 weeks. insivo runs hundreds of adaptive conversations across your project - stream leads, key-users, the business, external consultants - and delivers a structured diagnosis in 3 to 5 days, with root causes, prioritized actions and missing documents as finished drafts. Scalable from 50 to several hundred people, depending on project size. No consultant calendar, no filtering through the steering committee, ready to present directly to the project sponsor.
Before a diagnosis starts, the works council receives a complete package: all core questions, the methodological description of the AI logic, the anonymity concept and the GDPR proof as an exportable PDF. Technically, the diagnosis only starts after documented works-council approval. This is not a UI hint but a hard technical lock. Changes to the question catalog after a works-council rejection are possible. The system automatically generates an updated package.
Every stakeholder receives an anonymous link. No login, no name. The system stores only an encrypted token, never the email address in plain text. Analyses only appear from at least 5 responses per segment. All quotes are automatically pseudonymized and paraphrased. Tracing back to individuals is technically impossible, not just promised organizationally. This is the precondition for stream leads, key-users and external consultants to say openly what is really happening in the project.
From setup to a prioritized action list: 3 to 5 days. Classic project consulting takes 4 to 8 weeks, for a fraction of the interviews. With insivo, hundreds of interviews in 72 hours are possible, fully automatically analyzed, without quality loss from interviewer bias. Your stakeholders participate at their own pace - the report is created as soon as enough answers are in.
Every phase. insivo covers the entire project lifecycle and automatically adapts questions, methodology and depth to the respective phase. Depending on the situation, typical entry points emerge.
Before kick-off and in the first weeks: Are goals, roles and governance aligned? Does the steering committee have the same project in mind? Uncover conflicting goals and unspoken assumptions before they lead to rework months later.
During implementation: Make hidden blockers, duplicated work and cross-team conflicts visible. Where is the project losing momentum? What is running in parallel without anyone knowing? Which decisions are stuck in which committees?
3 to 6 months before Go-Live: Is the project really ready? Where will it blow up? Hundreds of stakeholders deliver a prioritized readiness map of the things you need to fix before Go-Live - including fallback-plan gaps, training gaps and knowledge-holder risks.
After Go-Live: The system is live - but are the promised benefits being realized? Adoption heatmap across teams, workaround detection, identification of unrealized benefits. Targeted course correction instead of a follow-up project.
Cross-cutting at any time: With 5 or more external consultants, insivo assesses the value contribution anonymously and based on data - who delivers, who does not. With hybrid or distributed teams, insivo makes visible where communication and knowledge transfer are breaking down.
The common thread across all phases: a growing project repository that learns from project to project - and gives your next rollout the insights from the previous one.
Yes, by design, not by policy. All data is processed exclusively on EU servers in Frankfurt and stored pseudonymized. No US data transfer without explicit agreement. Enterprise plans include an individual data processing agreement. Subprocessors such as Anthropic and Stripe are contractually bound and documented in the subprocessor list. On request, immediate data deletion under GDPR Art. 17.
At the end of every insivo diagnosis there are four concrete results.
Prioritized problem list: Each identified problem with its root cause, affected stakeholders and severity. Not "communication is bad", but "67% of key-users receive contradictory information from IT and the business - specifically in these three workstreams".
Action plan: Recommendations with owner, timeframe and expected impact. Immediately actionable, prioritized by leverage. No PowerPoint theory, but decision templates.
Generated documents: Missing project documents as finished drafts - generated directly from the interviews. Fallback plans, test scenarios, handover documents, training plans. Not as a recommendation, but as text you can reuse.
Project repository: A growing knowledge pool across projects. On the next rollout, insivo uses this knowledge as a basis: What went wrong at the last site? Which documents were missing? Which actions worked? The organization learns from project to project.
